Tag Archives: reports

Home Value Appreciation Has Slowed Each Month This Year

Annual home value appreciation decreased for the seventh straight month in July

By Jeff Sorg, OnlineEd Blog

(August 16, 2019)

SEATTLE, Aug. 16, 2019 /PRNewswire/ — U.S. home value growth continues to slow, according to the July Zillow® Real Estate Market Reporti. The typical U.S. home is worth $229,000, up 5.2% from a year ago – this is the smallest annual appreciation since October 2015. Last year at this time, home values rose 7.7% year-over-year. Still, home values are up 0.3% month-over-month, an indication that values are stabilizing after a period of relatively extreme growth rather than headed for a sustained downturn.

Among the 50 largest U.S. markets, home values have grown the most in Salt Lake City (up 9.4% since July 2018), Indianapolis (up 8.1%) and Charlotte (up 7.3%), although growth is slowing in each of these metros. Only New Orleans, Birmingham and Oklahoma City saw home values appreciate at a greater rate than a year ago.

Home values have fallen year-over-year in California’s San Francisco Bay Area, home to the two most expensive markets in the country. The value of the typical home fell 10.5% in San Jose and 1.1% in San Francisco. A year ago, home values were growing 24% annually in San Jose, a 34.5 percentage point difference.

“As talk builds of a potential recession in the next year or two, housing remains fairly stalwart,” said Zillow Director of Economic Research Skylar Olsen. “The slowing appreciation is ultimately a good sign that the market is adjusting in response to the growing unaffordability of down payments, while low mortgage rates are keeping those with the required savings interested despite softer growth out the gate. The uptick in the rate of homes coming onto the market – a good and true increase in supply – should be a boon to those inventory-starved home buyers still searching near the close of home shopping season. While buyers are catching a break, renters have seen prices continue their steady upward climb, presenting yet another obstacle in the quest to save for that down payment.”

The median U.S. rent rose 1.9% year-over-year to $1,592ii. For the eighth consecutive month, rents rose the most in Phoenix (up 6.1% from a year ago), followed by Las Vegas (up 5.9%). Rents fell in only three of the 50 largest markets – Houston, Buffalo and Baltimore.

Inventory grew 1.3% annually, reversing four straight months of declines. There are 19,978 more homes for sale than this time last year. New listings drove the inventory growth in July, up 5.7% from a year ago.

Mortgage rates listed on Zillow fell lower in July. Rates ended the month at 3.72%, down 23 basis points from July 1. Zillow’s real-time mortgage rates are based on thousands of custom mortgage quotes submitted daily to anonymous borrowers on the Zillow Mortgages site and reflect the most recent changes in the market.

Metropolitan Area Zillow Home Value Index, July 2019 ZHVI Year-over-Year Change, July 2019 ZHVI Year-over-Year Change, July 2018 Zillow Rent Index, July 2019 ZRI Year-over-Year Change, July 2019 Inventory Year-over-Year Change, July 2019
United States $229,000 5.2% 7.7% $1,592 1.9% 1.3%
New York, NY $442,800 3.2% 5.5% $2,279 2.3% 4.8%
Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA $650,600 0.9% 6.3% $2,599 1.3% 11.3%
Chicago, IL $225,200 2.1% 5.3% $1,615 1.3% 6.9%
Dallas-Fort Worth, TX $243,500 5.1% 11.8% $1,439 1.5% 12.3%
Philadelphia, PA $233,300 2.1% 5.3% $1,497 2.5% -4.8%
Houston, TX $206,400 3.4% 6.1% $1,378 -0.5% 5.5%
Washington, DC $407,700 2.1% 3.8% $1,971 2.0% -8.8%
Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL $284,300 3.2% 8.2% $1,851 2.2% 3.8%
Atlanta, GA $220,300 6.9% 11.8% $1,454 4.1% 8.3%
Boston, MA $463,300 1.9% 6.2% $2,416 2.2% 8.4%
San Francisco, CA $938,100 -1.1% 9.4% $3,166 1.2% 21.5%
Detroit, MI $162,900 4.6% 9.4% $1,211 2.3% 17.4%
Riverside, CA $371,500 3.3% 7.3% $1,907 4.3% -1.6%
Phoenix, AZ $267,500 4.5% 7.7% $1,401 6.1% -2.9%
Seattle, WA $489,500 0.5% 8.7% $2,036 2.4% 14.3%
Minneapolis-St Paul, MN $272,000 4.3% 6.6% $1,494 0.6% 4.9%
San Diego, CA $591,500 1.1% 6.1% $2,519 3.1% 6.0%
St. Louis, MO $167,700 3.5% 5.5% $1,009 1.3% -15.0%
Tampa, FL $216,400 5.0% 10.6% $1,392 3.7% 2.8%
Baltimore, MD $267,100 0.7% 4.9% $1,605 -0.1% -4.0%
Denver, CO $409,200 3.0% 6.7% $1,781 1.5% 26.9%
Pittsburgh, PA $144,700 2.5% 7.3% $1,102 1.8% -15.0%
Portland, OR $396,700 1.5% 5.3% $1,647 0.7% 3.1%
Charlotte, NC $210,600 7.3% 10.2% $1,322 3.5% 6.2%
Sacramento, CA $411,300 2.7% 5.4% $1,788 3.5% 0.8%
San Antonio, TX $195,600 5.0% 5.7% $1,215 0.3% 17.9%
Orlando, FL $240,000 5.1% 9.4% $1,414 3.5% 4.5%
Cincinnati, OH $170,400 5.4% 6.3% $1,145 3.2% -8.3%
Cleveland, OH $147,100 4.2% 6.6% $1,071 4.1% -1.3%
Kansas City, MO $191,900 4.7% 9.5% $1,121 1.0% N/A
Las Vegas, NV $279,100 5.1% 13.6% $1,329 5.9% 53.5%
Columbus, OH $193,800 6.5% 7.9% $1,183 0.6% -3.3%
Indianapolis, IN $167,300 8.1% 9.6% $1,100 1.0% N/A
San Jose, CA $1,144,800 -10.5% 24.0% $3,338 0.5% 32.6%
Austin, TX $312,300 4.7% 6.2% $1,586 2.1% -4.9%
Virginia Beach, VA $229,800 1.5% 2.8% $1,335 1.1% -9.6%
Nashville, TN $255,700 4.0% 9.8% $1,445 1.3% 14.6%
Providence, RI $295,100 3.4% 7.3% $1,427 3.2% -3.7%
Milwaukee, WI $232,500 4.5% 5.2% $1,094 2.5% 15.3%
Jacksonville, FL $214,400 5.5% 10.5% $1,348 3.9% -2.1%
Memphis, TN $141,000 5.1% 8.3% $1,047 4.2% -10.6%
Oklahoma City, OK $148,400 4.0% 2.9% $937 1.8% -11.5%
Louisville-Jefferson County, KY $164,400 5.5% 5.7% $1,087 1.4% -1.2%
Hartford, CT $229,100 0.2% 2.5% $1,334 1.1% -4.4%
Richmond, VA $232,000 4.0% 5.3% $1,323 1.3% N/A
New Orleans, LA $176,000 2.7% 0.0% $1,274 0.5% 0.4%
Buffalo, NY $161,400 4.4% 6.7% $1,015 -0.3% -1.2%
Raleigh, NC $269,100 5.2% 5.6% $1,286 1.0% 0.6%
Birmingham, AL $148,700 6.9% 5.5% $1,058 2.3% -5.9%
Salt Lake City, UT $373,200 9.4% 11.3% $1,494 1.7% 20.3%

 

[Source: Zillow press release]

###

OnlineEd blog postings are the opinion of the author and not intended as legal or other professional advice. Be sure to consult the appropriate party when professional advice is needed.

Excerpts from articles not originating with Jeff Sorg/OnlineEd are reprinted with permission; remain the sole property of the author; no permission to reprint is given or implied.

For more information about OnlineEd and their education for real estate brokers, principal brokers, property managers, and mortgage brokers visit www.OnlineEd.com.

Information contained in this posting is deemed correct as of the date of publication, but is not guaranteed by the author and may have been obtained from third-party sources. Due to the fluid nature of the subject matter, regulations, requirements and laws, prices and all other information may or may not be correct in the future and should be verified if cited, shared or otherwise republished.

OnlineEd® is a registered Trademark

Home Values Appreciated at Their Fastest Annual Pace Since August 2006

Portland home values rose 14 percent to a median value of $351,800

By Jeff Sorg, OnlineEd Blog

housing graph 3(December 23, 2016) –  In November, national home values rose at their fastest annual pace since 2006, near the peak of the housing bubble. The Zillow® Home Value Index (ZHVI) is $192,500, 2 percent shy of the records set in 2007, according to the November Zillow Real Estate Market Reportsii.

Rents, which were the big story of 2016 as they rose at a record pace, have slowed considerably to a 1.5 percent annual appreciation rate; this rate is expected to continue into 2017. The median monthly rent payment in the U.S. is now $1,403.

Home values were 6.5 percent higher this November than last. Strong growth is especially evident in a handful of new powerhouse markets, including Seattle, Denver, Portland and Dallas, whose strong job markets attracted new home buyers over the last year.

At their fastest pace, home values across the country were appreciating about 11 percent year-over-year. When the bubble burst, home values plummeted, falling 7.4 percent year-over-year during the depths of the crisis, and then began a steady recovery in 2012.

“Home value growth continues to be strong, supported by solid buyer demand and still limited for-sale inventory in many markets across the country,” said Zillow Chief Economist Dr. Svenja Gudell. “Conditions today are very different than the ones we saw back in 2006, which was the last time we saw home values rising this fast. Rampant real estate speculation and loose mortgage credit have been replaced by the sound economic fundamentals we are seeing now.”

Portland, Seattle, and Dallas reported the highest year-over-year home value appreciation among the 35 largest U.S. metros. Portland home values rose 14 percent to a median value of $351,800. Both Seattle and Dallas home values rose 12 percent since last November.

Seattle reported the fastest rent appreciation of the 35 largest U.S. metros for the sixth month in a row, up almost 9 percent annually. Portland and Sacramento follow Seattle, with rents up about 7 percent.

Inventory remains an issue for home buyers across the country. There are 6 percent fewer homes to choose from than a year ago, with Boston, Indianapolis and Kansas City reporting the greatest drop. In Boston, there are 26 percent fewer homes to choose from than a year ago, and 21 percent fewer in Indianapolis and Kansas City.

Metropolitan
Area

Zillow
Home Value
Index (ZHVI)

Year-over-
Year ZHVI
Change

Zillow Rent
Index (ZRI)

Year-over-
Year ZRI
Change

Year-over-Year
Inventory
Change

United States

$    192,500

6.5%

$                 1,403

1.5%

-5.9%

New York, NY

$    400,500

6.0%

$                 2,389

0.5%

-10.4%

Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA

$    590,000

6.3%

$                 2,616

5.2%

-7.1%

Chicago, IL

$    203,400

5.0%

$                 1,637

-0.1%

-10.2%

Dallas-Fort Worth, TX

$    200,400

12.0%

$                 1,556

4.0%

-13.9%

Philadelphia, PA

$    213,800

4.1%

$                 1,574

1.0%

-12.3%

Houston, TX

$    176,000

7.0%

$                 1,562

-1.1%

0.6%

Washington, DC

$    378,000

2.9%

$                 2,123

0.6%

-18.8%

Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL

$    245,200

8.8%

$                 1,879

3.1%

11.8%

Atlanta, GA

$    172,300

7.5%

$                 1,329

4.3%

-5.7%

Boston, MA

$    408,400

6.1%

$                 2,322

3.5%

-25.5%

San Francisco, CA

$    824,600

4.9%

$                 3,385

1.8%

-5.0%

Detroit, MI

$    134,400

9.4%

$                 1,169

3.2%

-17.2%

Riverside, CA

$    318,200

6.7%

$                 1,742

3.1%

-8.1%

Phoenix, AZ

$    228,900

6.9%

$                 1,301

4.1%

-1.4%

Seattle, WA

$    412,600

12.2%

$                 2,095

8.8%

-6.5%

Minneapolis-St Paul, MN

$    235,000

6.6%

$                 1,552

3.3%

-18.2%

San Diego, CA

$    526,500

6.1%

$                 2,436

5.2%

2.8%

St. Louis, MO

$    147,800

6.8%

$                 1,123

0.1%

-14.5%

Tampa, FL

$    177,200

11.2%

$                 1,336

3.2%

-10.7%

Baltimore, MD

$    256,600

3.6%

$                 1,729

0.7%

-16.0%

Denver, CO

$    352,800

9.7%

$                 2,006

2.8%

4.0%

Pittsburgh, PA

$    133,400

4.8%

$                 1,081

-1.4%

0.3%

Portland, OR

$    351,800

14.1%

$                 1,802

7.1%

-3.6%

Charlotte, NC

$    166,600

7.1%

$                 1,244

1.8%

-10.4%

Sacramento, CA

$    350,200

7.5%

$                 1,707

6.8%

-6.3%

San Antonio, TX

$    156,200

6.5%

$                 1,324

1.6%

12.8%

Orlando, FL

$    198,100

9.9%

$                 1,383

3.1%

-11.1%

Cincinnati, OH

$    147,800

5.6%

$                 1,243

1.5%

-16.3%

Cleveland, OH

$    130,600

5.2%

$                 1,145

1.6%

-10.8%

Kansas City, MO

$    151,900

5.9%

$                 1,241

3.8%

-20.5%

Las Vegas, NV

$    213,700

9.6%

$                 1,243

2.4%

26.0%

Columbus, OH

$    160,400

3.9%

$                 1,293

1.7%

-18.9%

Indianapolis, IN

$    133,600

1.5%

$                 1,188

0.3%

-20.7%

San Jose, CA

$    961,600

4.3%

$                 3,486

1.9%

-14.4%

Austin, TX

$    259,800

8.4%

$                 1,701

0.9%

11.9%

Zillow

###

Zillow and Zestimate are registered trademarks of Zillow, Inc.

For more information about OnlineEd and their education for real estate brokers, principal brokers, property managers, and mortgage brokers, visit www.OnlineEd.com.

All information contained in this posting is deemed correct as of the date of publication, but is not guaranteed by the author and may have been obtained from third-party sources. Due to the fluid nature of the subject matter, regulations, requirements and laws, prices and all other information may or may not be correct in the future and should be verified if cited, shared or otherwise republished.

OnlineEd® is a registered Trademark

Seattle and Portland Rents Expected to Rise 6% and 7%

Zillow forecasts rent growth of more than 7 percent in Seattle and 6 percent in Portland

By Jeff Sorg, OnlineEd Blog

canstockphoto33101878-no-vacancies (October 11, 2016) – According to the latest Zillow® Rent Forecast for August 2016 to August 2017, rents in the West’s tech job centers are predicted to be among some of the fastest growing in the nation over the next year. The Zillow® Rent Forecast predicts rent trends down to the zip-code across the U.S.

Rents in Seattle and Portland are expected to rise the most over the next 12 months — Zillow forecasts rent growth of more than 7 percent in Seattle and 6 percent in Portland. Denver, San Francisco, and San Jose are predicted to see rent appreciation of more than 4 percent. Only 11 of the 35 largest metros will see a slowdown in rents.

 

Highest Forecasted Rent Appreciation over the Next Year

  1. Seattle – 7.2 percent
  2. Portland – 6.0 percent
  3. Denver – 5.9 percent
  4. Cincinnati – 5.2 percent
  5. San Francisco – 4.9 percent
  6. Los Angeles – 4.8 percent
  7. Sacramento – 4.7 percent
  8. San Diego – 4.7 percent
  9. Phoenix – 4.6 percent
  10. San Jose – 4.5 percent

[Source: Zillow]

###

For more information about OnlineEd and their education for real estate brokers, principal brokers, property managers, and mortgage brokers, visit www.OnlineEd.com.

All information contained in this posting is deemed correct as of the date of publication, but is not guaranteed by the author and may have been obtained from third-party sources. Due to the fluid nature of the subject matter, regulations, requirements and laws, prices and all other information may or may not be correct in the future and should be verified if cited, shared or otherwise republished.

OnlineEd® is a registered Trademark

Portland Home Values Rise 15 Percent

San Francisco and San Jose are no longer among the top appreciating U.S. housing markets

By Jeff Sorg, OnlineEd Blog

housing graph 3(September 22, 2016) – U.S. home values are up 5 percent over the past year, to a Zillow Home Value Index (ZHVI) of $188,100, according to the August Zillow® Real Estate Market Reports.

Home values have been growing at a 5 percent annual rate since the beginning of the year. The most recent income data released by the Censusiii shows incomes rising by 5.2 percent, which is good news for those looking to break into the housing market. For the first time since 2011, incomes have been appreciating faster than home values.

Inventory is beginning to pick back up from the lows experienced at the beginning of the year, but there are still 5 percent fewer homes for sale than a year ago. Going forward, as more homes start to become available, home value growth may ease. Zillow predicts home value growth to slow down to a 2.7 percent appreciation rate by this time next year.

For the sixth straight month, Portland, Dallas, Seattle and Denver reported the highest year-over-year home value appreciation among the 35 largest U.S. metros, with home value growth in the double-digits. In Portland, home values rose almost 15 percent, to a median home value of $338,900.

While home values continue to rise in tech-centers San Francisco and San Jose, they’ve slowed considerably since last year. Median home values in both markets are up about 6 percent over the past year, compared to over 12 percent in 2015. No longer are these two metros among the top appreciating U.S. housing markets.

“The housing market is starting to smooth out ever-so-slightly, as the peak home shopping season winds down,” said Zillow Chief Economist Dr. Svenja Gudell. “This is good news for frenzied buyers tired of tight inventory, rapidly rising home prices and intense competition. Inventory, while still down nationwide and in most areas, is actually starting to rise in a handful of markets, including the Bay Area, Texas and parts of the Southwest. Rent growth has slowed considerably from just a few years ago, giving renters a chance to save enough to buy a home. But make no mistake, it’s still tough out there for buyers, especially in Western markets like Seattle, Denver and Portland that have strong job growth. Things won’t switch from a sellers’ market to a buyers’ market overnight, but conditions are starting to improve.”

Rents continue to rise, though not as quickly as home values. Last year at this time, rents were up over 6 percent, but are now appreciating by just 1.7 percent, to a Zillow Rent Index (ZRI) of $1,405.

Of the 35 largest U.S. metros, Seattle, Portland, Sacramento and San Diego reported the highest year-over-year rent appreciation. Rents in Seattle have seen the fastest annual appreciation for the third month in a row, up almost 10 percent over the past year to a median of $2,067 per month.

In Portland, the median rent rose to $1,777 per month, up 7 percent over the past year. In Sacramento and San Diego, rents are up 5.5 and 5 percent, respectively.

 

Metropolitan Area Zillow Home

Value Index (ZHVI)

Year-Over-Year ZHVI Change Zillow Rent Index (ZRI) Year-Over-Year ZRI Change Year-Over-Year Inventory Change
United States $             188,100 5.1% $         1,405 1.7% -5.4%
New York/Northern New Jersey $             389,000 3.3% $         2,399 2.5% -11.7%
Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA $             574,600 5.2% $         2,593 4.7% 0.6%
Chicago, IL $             201,300 4.5% $         1,643 -0.2% -11.5%
Dallas-Fort Worth, TX $             193,900 12.0% $         1,543 3.6% -20.6%
Philadelphia, PA $             210,000 2.9% $         1,578 1.3% -13.3%
Houston, TX $             174,000 7.1% $         1,576 0.5% 7.4%
Washington, DC $             370,100 2.1% $         2,121 0.5% -15.0%
Miami-Fort

Lauderdale, FL

$             239,300 9.0% $         1,885 4.2% 14.1%
Atlanta, GA $             168,400 7.5% $         1,314 3.5% -8.6%
Boston, MA $             398,200 5.6% $         2,310 3.9% -26.4%
San Francisco, CA $             809,500 6.0% $         3,406 4.8% 1.8%
Detroit, MI $             129,600 6.8% $         1,171 2.5% -17.8%
Riverside, CA $             313,400 7.0% $         1,736 3.4% -0.7%
Phoenix, AZ $             223,100 7.5% $         1,297 4.2% 8.3%
Seattle, WA $             397,800 11.3% $         2,067 9.7% -6.0%
Minneapolis-St Paul,

MN

$             229,300 6.2% $         1,540 2.5% -2.7%
San Diego, CA $             516,200 5.2% $         2,427 4.9% 13.0%
St. Louis, MO $             144,000 5.3% $         1,128 0.5% -13.2%
Tampa, FL $             170,500 9.8% $         1,332 3.3% -10.1%
Baltimore, MD $             252,700 2.5% $         1,731 0.6% -10.4%
Denver, CO $             341,400 10.7% $         2,013 4.1% 7.4%
Pittsburgh, PA $             131,200 4.6% $         1,100 -0.5% 3.7%
Portland, OR $             338,900 14.8% $         1,777 7.4% -12.4%
Charlotte, NC $             164,400 7.1% $         1,237 1.7% -10.3%
Sacramento, CA $             345,100 7.1% $         1,681 5.5% -6.4%
San Antonio, TX $             153,600 6.4% $         1,317 0.9% 25.2%
Orlando, FL $             189,000 8.1% $         1,372 2.8% -10.8%
Cincinnati, OH $             145,100 4.6% $         1,239 0.2% -15.7%
Cleveland, OH $             129,000 3.4% $         1,146 1.3% -12.7%
Kansas City, MO $             150,700 5.2% $         1,235 2.3% -23.6%
Las Vegas, NV $             206,800 7.8% $         1,237 2.0% 32.7%
Columbus, OH $             157,000 3.0% $         1,293 2.0% -16.6%
Indianapolis, IN $             131,700 -1.6% $         1,196 0.4% -24.7%
San Jose, CA $             945,700 5.8% $         3,517 3.8% 12.9%
Austin, TX $             255,900 8.6% $         1,713 2.0% 11.1%

[Source: Zillow®]

###

Zillow® is a registered trademark of Zillow, Inc.

For more information about OnlineEd and their education for real estate brokers, principal brokers, property managers, and mortgage brokers, visit www.OnlineEd.com.

All information contained in this posting is deemed correct as of the date of publication, but is not guaranteed by the author and may have been obtained from third-party sources. Due to the fluid nature of the subject matter, regulations, requirements and laws, prices and all other information may or may not be correct in the future and should be verified if cited, shared or otherwise republished.

OnlineEd® is a registered Trademark

Appraisals Continue to Fall Below Homeowner Value Perceptions

The trend of owners overestimating their home’s value when refinancing continued in August

By Jeff Sorg, OnlineEd Blog

(September 20, 2016) –  According to a recent report by Quicken Loans, appraisals across the country were an average of 1.56 percent lower than what refinancing homeowners expected in August, based on the company’s national Home Price Perception Index (HPPI).

The Quicken Loans Home Value Index (HVI), which measures home value changes exclusively through appraisals, moved higher yet in August. Home values increased 1.73 percent over the previous month while jumping 8.13 percent higher than August 2015, according to the national HVI.

unnamed

 

###

For more information about OnlineEd and their education for real estate brokers, principal brokers, property managers, and mortgage brokers, visit www.OnlineEd.com.

All information contained in this posting is deemed correct as of the date of publication, but is not guaranteed by the author and may have been obtained from third-party sources. Due to the fluid nature of the subject matter, regulations, requirements and laws, prices and all other information may or may not be correct in the future and should be verified if cited, shared or otherwise republished.

OnlineEd® is a registered Trademark

Average Fixer-Upper Saves Buyers Just 8% For Renovations

canstockphoto29690433 fixer upperThe median fixer-upper would save buyers only $11,000

By Jeff Sorg, OnlineEd Blog

(September 1, 2016) – Fixer uppers are appealing to some who think they can make a sizeable savings or profit with a flip, but according to a recent report by Zillow Digs® the average 8% discount these buyers save on price might not even cover necessary renovation costs. The median fixer-upper would save buyers only $11,000 for renovations, the report says.

Zillow Digs analyzed nearly 70,000 listings for fixer-uppers from around the country to see how their list prices compared to their estimated values. If renovation costs exceed the home’s discount, then it may be more cost-effective to buy a similar home that doesn’t require renovations. Fixer-uppers were identified based on listing description keywords that signaled the home needs work, like “TLC,” “good bones” and “fixer-upper.”

“Fixer-uppers can be a great deal, and they allow buyers to incorporate their personal style into a home while renovating, but it’s still a good idea to do the math before making the leap,” says Svenja Gudell, Zillow chief economist. “While an 8 percent discount or $11,000 in upfront savings on a fixer-upper is certainly a good chunk of change, it likely won’t be enough to cover a kitchen remodel, let alone structural updates like a new roof or plumbing, which many of these properties may require.”

[Source: Zillow]

###

Zillow and Zillow.com are registered trademarks of Zillow, Inc.

For more information about OnlineEd and their education for real estate brokers, principal brokers, property managers, and mortgage brokers, visit www.OnlineEd.com.

All information contained in this posting is deemed correct as of the date of publication, but is not guaranteed by the author and may have been obtained from third-party sources. Due to the fluid nature of the subject matter, regulations, requirements and laws, prices and all other information may or may not be correct in the future and should be verified if cited, shared or otherwise republished.

OnlineEd® is a registered Trademark

Home Values Rise for 48th Straight Month – Portland, OR Tops List at 14.7%

 Portland, OR reported the highest year-over-year home value appreciation

By Jeff Sorg, OnlineEd Blog

rising housing prices 1(August 18, 2016) –  National home values appreciated for the 48th straight month this July to a Zillow Home Value Index (ZHVI) of $187,300, according to the Zillow® Real Estate Market Reports.

Home values are up 5 percent over the past year and have been consistently climbing since August 2012, but remain 4.7 percent below peak, which was hit in April 2007 when the median home value was $196,600.

Portland, Dallas, and Denver reported the highest year-over-year home value appreciation among the 35 largest metros across the country. In Portland, home values rose almost 15 percent to a median value of $334,900. Home values in Dallas and Denver appreciated 11.9 and 11.3 percent, respectively.

In notoriously expensive San Francisco, home values have been slowing since the beginning of the year. In January, home values were up almost 12 percent year-over-year and are now appreciating at about half that pace, up 6.6 percent over the past year.

“The consistent rise in home values that we’ve been seeing for the past four years masks a number of region-specific trends that have taken place over the past few months,” said Zillow Chief Economist Dr. Svenja Gudell. “In most areas, the market is being driven mainly by a strong labor market and tight supply, especially among entry-level homes that first-time buyers are after. But some markets – especially the red-hot Pacific Northwest – are adding more jobs and attracting more residents, putting the pressure on home values and rents. The Bay Area and Southern California are still growing at a faster pace than the nation as a whole, but growth rates have come back to earth a bit after several years of rapid growth. And markets in other regions, like the Northeast, keep steadily chugging along. All housing is local, and as the local economies in individual metros ebb and flow, housing will follow suit. More than at any time since the boom and bust, we’re seeing a housing market that is driven by local fundamentals, and not by national trends.”

Rents across the country rose 2 percent over the past year, to a Zillow Rent Index(ZRI) of $1,408 — this is the 47th straight month rents have appreciated.

Of the 35 largest U.S. metros, Seattle, Portland and San Francisco reported the highest year-over-year rent appreciation. In Seattle, rents rose almost 10 percent, to a median rent price of $2,052 per month, while rents in Portland rose just over 8 percent.

In San Francisco, the median rent price rose to $3,407 per month, the second highest of all U.S. metros, right after San Jose, CA. Rents in San Francisco appreciated 6 percent over the past year.

Metropolitan Area Zillow Home Value Index (ZHVI) Year-Over-Year ZHVI Change  Peak ZHVI Change from Peak Zillow Rent Index (ZRI) Year-Over-Year ZRI Change
United States $           187,300 5.1% $      196,600 -4.7% $         1,408 2.2%
New York/Northern New Jersey $           387,800 3.4% $      445,200 -12.9% $         2,411 3.2%
Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA $           572,400 5.3% $      604,000 -5.2% $         2,585 4.7%
Chicago, IL $           199,800 4.0% $      247,000 -19.1% $         1,645 0.3%
Dallas-Fort Worth, TX $           191,500 11.9% $      191,500 0.0% $         1,543 4.0%
Philadelphia, PA $           209,200 3.0% $      230,600 -9.3% $         1,582 2.0%
Houston, TX $           173,500 7.6% $      173,500 0.0% $         1,581 1.5%
Washington, DC $           368,600 1.7% $      427,600 -13.8% $         2,123 0.7%
Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL $           237,300 9.3% $      305,100 -22.2% $         1,887 4.8%
Atlanta, GA $           167,300 7.5% $      174,500 -4.1% $         1,311 3.9%
Boston, MA $           396,300 5.8% $      396,300 0.0% $         2,308 4.5%
San Francisco, CA $           807,800 6.6% $      807,800 0.0% $         3,407 6.2%
Detroit, MI $           128,300 6.2% $      157,100 -18.3% $         1,175 2.8%
Riverside, CA $           311,700 7.1% $      403,900 -22.8% $         1,738 4.0%
Phoenix, AZ $           221,900 8.0% $      273,600 -18.9% $         1,298 4.8%
Seattle, WA $           394,600 11.3% $      394,600 0.0% $         2,052 9.9%
Minneapolis-St Paul, MN $           228,400 6.2% $      240,500 -5.0% $         1,541 3.0%
San Diego, CA $           513,600 5.4% $      543,700 -5.5% $         2,424 5.0%
St. Louis, MO $           143,100 5.0% $      158,900 -9.9% $         1,135 1.5%
Tampa, FL $           168,800 9.4% $      214,200 -21.2% $         1,332 3.7%
Baltimore, MD $           253,000 2.8% $      289,100 -12.5% $         1,735 1.0%
Denver, CO $           339,600 11.3% $      339,600 0.0% $         2,013 5.1%
Pittsburgh, PA $           131,000 4.7% $      131,000 0.0% $         1,113 1.8%

Portland, OR

$           334,900

14.7%

$      334,900

0.0%

$         1,772

8.2%

Charlotte, NC $           163,400 6.8% $      163,400 0.0% $         1,240 2.3%
Sacramento, CA $           343,000 7.0% $      420,800 -18.5% $         1,675 5.6%
San Antonio, TX $           152,900 6.6% $      152,900 0.0% $         1,318 1.5%
Orlando, FL $           187,500 7.8% $      256,200 -26.8% $         1,370 3.2%
Cincinnati, OH $           144,700 4.9% $      144,700 0.0% $         1,241 0.4%
Cleveland, OH $           128,800 3.5% $      145,400 -11.4% $         1,148 1.6%
Kansas City, MO $           150,000 5.2% $      159,500 -6.0% $         1,240 2.7%
Las Vegas, NV $           204,700 7.2% $      304,700 -32.8% $         1,238 2.6%
Columbus, OH $           156,900 3.6% $      156,900 0.0%

(Article source: Zillow®)

###

Zillow® is a registered trademark of Zillow, Inc.

For more information about OnlineEd and their education for real estate brokers, principal brokers, property managers, and mortgage brokers, visit www.OnlineEd.com.

All information contained in this posting is deemed correct as of the date of publication, but is not guaranteed by the author and may have been obtained from third-party sources. Due to the fluid nature of the subject matter, regulations, requirements and laws, prices and all other information may or may not be correct in the future and should be verified if cited, shared or otherwise republished.

OnlineEd® is a registered Trademark

July 2016 Housing Starts Climb 5.6% Over July 2015

New residential construction report for July 2016

By Jeff Sorg, OnlineEd Blog

housing graph 3(August 18, 2016) – The U.S. Census Bureau and the Department of Housing and Urban Development jointly announced the following new residential construction statistics for July 2016:

BUILDING PERMITS Privately-owned housing units authorized by building permits in July were at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 1,152,000. This is 0.1 percent (±1.2%)* below the revised June rate of 1,153,000, but is 0.9 percent (±1.5%)* above the July 2015 estimate of 1,142,000. Single-family authorizations in July were at a rate of 711,000; this is 3.7 percent (±1.4%) below the revised June figure of 738,000. Authorizations of units in buildings with five units or more were at a rate of 411,000 in July.

HOUSING STARTS Privately-owned housing starts in July were at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 1,211,000. This is 2.1 percent (±8.8%)* above the revised June estimate of 1,186,000 and is 5.6 percent (±14.7%)* above the July 2015 rate of 1,147,000. Single-family housing starts in July were at a rate of 770,000; this is 0.5 percent (±8.6%)* above the revised June figure of 766,000. The July rate for units in buildings with five units or more was 433,000.

HOUSING COMPLETIONS Privately-owned housing completions in July were at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 1,026,000. This is 8.3 percent (±8.9%)* below the revised June estimate of 1,119,000, but is 3.2 percent (±11.2%)* above the July 2015 rate of 994,000. Single-family housing completions in July were at a rate of 743,000; this is 0.4 percent (±8.8%)* below the revised June rate of 746,000. The July rate for units in buildings with five units or more was 275,000

###

For more information about OnlineEd and their education for real estate brokers, principal brokers, property managers, and mortgage brokers, visit www.OnlineEd.com.

All information contained in this posting is deemed correct as of the date of publication, but is not guaranteed by the author and may have been obtained from third-party sources. Due to the fluid nature of the subject matter, regulations, requirements and laws, prices and all other information may or may not be correct in the future and should be verified if cited, shared or otherwise republished.

OnlineEd® is a registered Trademark

Housing Status Quo Not Working and Voters Blame Banks

“It’s too difficult for people like me to buy a home”

By Jeff Sorg, OnlineEd Blog

canstockphoto23094189reportgraph1(July 27, 2016) – According to a recent report by Schoen Consulting, voters believe that the housing status quo is not working, especially for people of color, and they blame banks and the federal government for not helping with policies to help with homeownership, affordable housing, and more lending. Additionally, a majority 53% of American voters believe that “It’s too difficult for people like me to buy a home,” and 41% of likely voters agree that “Banks don’t want to provide mortgages to people like me.” View or download the report here.

###

For more information about OnlineEd and their education for real estate brokers, principal brokers, property managers, and mortgage brokers, visit www.OnlineEd.com.

All information contained in this posting is deemed correct as of the date of publication, but is not guaranteed by the author and may have been obtained from third-party sources. Due to the fluid nature of the subject matter, regulations, requirements and laws, prices and all other information may or may not be correct in the future and should be verified if cited, shared or otherwise republished.

OnlineEd® is a registered Trademark

Renters Continue To Perceive Obtaining a Mortgage is Difficult

Renters strongly prefer to own instead of rent

By Jeff Sorg, OnlineEd Blog

canstockphoto22765888 rent or buy(June 7, 2016) – According to the results of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York’s  February 2016 SCE Housing Survey, renters continue to perceive obtaining a mortgage (if they wanted to buy a home) as difficult, with two-thirds stating that it would be somewhat or very difficult to get a mortgage. However, there are signs of improved perceived credit access relative to previous surveys. The share of renters reporting that obtaining a mortgage would be (somewhat or very) easy rose to 17.5 percent (from 12.8 percent in 2014, and 14.7 percent in 2015). This held across all demographic groups.

Renters continue to report a strong preference for owning. The share of renters who report preferring or strongly preferring to own instead of rent (if they had the financial resources to do so) rose to 74.1 percent from 68.5 percent in 2015.

###

For more information about OnlineEd and their education for real estate brokers, principal brokers, property managers, and mortgage brokers, visit www.OnlineEd.com.

All information contained in this posting is deemed correct as of the date of publication, but is not guaranteed by the author and may have been obtained from third-party sources. Due to the fluid nature of the subject matter, regulations, requirements and laws, prices and all other information may or may not be correct in the future and should be verified if cited, shared or otherwise republished.

OnlineEd® is a registered trademark of Harlow Spaan and Jeffrey Sorg